An Evil Woman

In a disappointing turn of events a young advocate for women has been successfully indoctrinated into voting for Hillary Clinton based on the “news” she has seen or read as indicated by what she writes:

Trump is a despicable, unpredictable megalomaniac that has zero plan and on top of it is racist, xenophobic, alienating, misogynist, who not only has sexually assaulted women but brags about it openly.

But will she change her mind after the alleged “victims” of Trump sexual assaults speak out in defending Trump and accuse NYT of lying about them and distorting the truth? Or will the release of emails proving the Hillary campaign is behind the turmoil be too late? Where do these women’s stories originate?

In the Marxist manual for Hillary’s campaign, Rules for Radicals by Saul Alinsky, a key rule is to accuse the opposition of what you do or plan to do in order to create the illusion that your position is the legitimate position. Read the details attached to this YouTube https://youtu.be/pC-w-XV00aA

But the truth is being revealed through emails being verified and reported upon as rapidly as possible.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/08/02/exclusive-nbc-quietly-scrubs-discredited-smear-clinton-rape-accuser/

When NBC “Today Show” anchor Andrea Mitchell reversed a 1999 NBC report and claimed Clinton rape victim Juanita Broaddrick’s accusation had been “discredited,” the network quickly and very quietly removed the word discredited from its web site knowing their own story from 1999 had been well documented to support Broaddrick’s accusations. But in the midst of the Clinton campaign and their promoting of accusers of Donald Trump, the network refused to apologize or even retract the word on the air.

It is incredibly disappointing that NBC and Andrea Mitchell will not publicly apologize for this egregious error, especially considering that NBC has retroactively edited the online version of the story and taken out the word ‘discredited.’”

http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presidential-race/2016/06/15/leaked-dnc-files-dems-planned-hit-trump-widely-discredited-hit-piece-falsely-accusing-rape/

Top allies of Democratic presumptive nominee Hillary Clinton planned to falsely accuse presumptive GOP nominee Donald Trump of rape, a leaked file from the Democratic National Committee (DNC) shows.

This story became reality when Megyn Kelly rushed the story on air before verifying its contents, over and over again.”

The story was addressed by the woman who allegedly made the accusations – Ivana Trump, during divorce proceedings. Ivana’s on statements continued, “Not In The ‘Criminal Sense.’” but Kelly didn’t care to be honest in what appears now to be part of the Clinton campaign strategy.

Ivana Trump told CNN right after the story broke in The Daily Beast:

I have recently read some comments attributed to me from nearly 30 years ago at a time of very high tension during my divorce from Donald. The story is totally without merit. Donald and I are the best of friends and together have raised three children that we love and are very proud of. I have nothing but fondness for Donald and wish him the best of luck on his campaign. Incidentally, I think he would make an incredible president.

Ironically, The Daily Beast never made any attempt to verify the story with Ivana Trump before rushing the 1,700-word smear to print back in July. What’s perhaps most important about this situation is that, despite the story being entirely disproven about Trump—disproven by his own ex-wife no less— the DNC wanted to send Trump through the exact same ringer again at one point or another during the forthcoming battle with Hillary Clinton. The Democrats clearly care not one bit about accuracy, since the Party’s official opposition research files on Trump don’t even include the full story—or the fact that said accusations have been discredited.

Now let’s look at Jessica Leeds accusation about Trump being like an octopus…

http://www.westernjournalism.com/thepoint/2016/10/14/1-key-thing-just-uncovered-about-trump-sex-accuser-shows-her-story-already-unraveling/

As of now, the FAA cannot confirm her to have been on any passenger or crew manifest with Trump. (Another passenger who was confirmed to have been on the flight across the aisle from Trump has stated on the record that Leeds story is a lie.)

However, we can confirm that Jessica Leeds has been in a long-running property dispute with Donald Trump since at least 2007. Leeds, herself a millionaire, is quoted in the New York Daily News in 2007 complaining about Trump’s (then new) Rancho Palos Verdes Golf Course in California:

In yet another story, this one run by the Associated Press, Leeds complains of the trees on Trump’s golf courses.

In 2008, the Los Angeles Times ran with a similar story. Framing their piece as a random property dispute, the Times reported: “A Rancho Palos Verdes woman says the Donald Trump organization summarily ended a property dispute by sending a construction crew and bulldozers to rip down and relocate the fence in her backyard. The homeowner, Jessica Leeds…”

The New York Times which initially ran the accusation story could easily have found that Leeds may or may not have ever been on an airplane with Trump, but she has a nearly ten-year-old beef with the real estate mogul over a property dispute.

And so a comment to my young Hillary supporter and advocate for women rape victims I ask….

As a professional involved and concerned about the trama suffered by rape victims, and a Hillary voter, it must be sad to realize every single accusation you have made against Donald Trump is now proving beyond a doubt to be fabricated by the Hillary campaign…

By perpetrating a possible lie, the Times manipulation of serious sexual assault allegations to support the candidacy of Hillary Clinton and achieve its radical, leftist political agenda does a disservice to real victims of sexual assault. They are now forced to climb over an even higher bar to have their stories heard and justice served.

Typical of the left’s cynical whatever-it-takes approach to winning the political war — they are willing to do lasting damage to the cause of the very “victims” they’re claiming to champion.

On the other hand…

http://observer.com/2016/07/up-next-for-the-fbi-clinton-foundation-corruption/

Hillary was the accuser-in-chief of attacking the credibility of Bill Clinton victims during the ‘bimbo eruption’ days of Clinton’s presidency and beyond. Some readers may remember her accusing the accusers of being bimbos when she made the comment about dragging a dollar bill through a trailer park and catching all the bimbos you could ever want.  If ever there was a “war on women” Hillary would be the most qualified candidate to be commander-in-chief.

Billionaire sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, who claims to have co-founded the Clinton Global Initiative, served 13 months in jail for soliciting prostitution from a minor. Epstein is the subject of ongoing litigation involving several other underage victims, and flight logs from Epstein’s private jet show Bill Clinton flew with him at least 26 times. Vice News reported one of Epstein’s victims, Virginia Roberts, told her attorneys she had damaging information on Bill Clinton.

And now for the real issue of honesty…

North Florida-based Congresswoman Corinne Brown is the latest Clinton super delegate to receive an indictment for corruption and ethics violations. Brown allegedly received $800,000 from an organization called One Door For Education under false pretenses that the funds would be used for charitable purposes.

Late last month, Congressman Chaka Fattah was convicted on charges of racketeering, corruption and stealing charitable funds. Sen. Bob Menendez, Gov. Andrew Cuomo, Gov. Dannel Malloy and the former Virginia governor who served as Clinton’s 2008 campaign chair, Terry McAuliffe, are also in the midst of corruption probes.

God Bless Edward Snowden

God Bless Julian Assange

God Bless America

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On Natural order for War

A natural law of nature governing survival is that a species must migrate, adapt, or die. Migration is the process of relocating to food, better shelter, or away from predators. Adaptation is the very slow process of physical change to better exist within the environment available; ie evolution. Dying is the result of not being able or willing to complete either of the other two.

The Unites States military has recently announced that 16 service people, including a general, will be punished for the “accidental” bombing of a medical facility in the area where an active conflict is raging and innocent people are regularly being murdered in horrific public beheadings and wholesale slaughter. These victims didn’t migrate, they couldn’t adapt to being Muslim, so they died.

Armies are said to always be prepared to win a new war having reviewed the strategies of the last one. But is that true if the previous war was neither won nor lost? No military conflict can be truly settled until one of the ideologies no longer has the support of its followers to continue sustaining losses of its people and property. Even ideologies must follow the rules of nature. When conditions warrant, those who believe in an ideology must adapt, migrate away from the adversity or die.

Support by the general populations of both Germany and Japan was withdrawn from their governments when losses were seen as greater than whatever gain might be won. Germany’s formidable army was well entrenched in Europe when the American led allies began sending thousands of bombers with thousands of tons of bombs deep behind the battle front lines and into the German homeland to ‘carpet bomb’ the infrastructure supporting the front-line armies. Killing people and destroying property is the entire purpose of war. It changes the habitat conditions of the enemy. Victory is won by whichever ideology does this best. Peace always results when followers of the losing ideology come to understand they must either stop fighting or suffer more than they are willing to do.

The horrific scene of the nuclear bombs in their homeland immediately changed the minds of Japanese from believing in the expansion of their empire to understanding that their very autonomy could be completely lost if the fighting continued. After the surrender of the forces led by both Germany and Japan, for the most part, American soldiers came home and the German and Japanese people were allowed to rebuild their countries and preserve much of their cultures. Today, both of these formidable enemies are valued friends of America.

But the same scenes of mass destruction that literally ended the great world war overnight also ended the resolve of Americans to win a war by fighting a war. Never again has America entered into a military conflict with any resolve whatsoever to defeat the opposition forces. Since those massive bombings that stopped the fighting around the world in the forties, the purpose of the American military overseas has been only to try to persuade the opposing ideologies to limit the fighting to specifically defined lines of combat and reach negotiated settlements without either side suffering losses to the civilian populations or their infrastructure. This is a policy which defies the very motivation for either side to stop fighting – no loss of support by the population for their government or ideological leaders. And so it is that for more than two decades now the warriors of Islam have been able to receive support and carry on their war against non-Muslims around the world.

Having been nearly unaffected by the recent world war, the Korean peninsula erupted into military conflict only a few years after the ‘bombs’ and the defacto hands off the land-behind-the-lines policy unilaterally initiated by the United States. That policy has resulted in no peaceful relationship between the two Koreas for more than 70 years. Some might argue the situation has even gotten more dangerous in recent years as North Korea’s government has never lost the support of the population to lift them from poverty by obtaining the obvious prosperity of its southern neighbor and even punishing the United States for helping South Korea keep them in poverty.

The Viet Nam Conflict might well have continued for a second decade except for the fact that the people of the United States clearly decided they were no longer willing to support the government’s action. But unlike Korea where neither side was willing to surrender, the Viet Nam peninsula is united and prosperous due undoubtedly to the fact that the U.S. accepted defeat, surrendered and withdrew.

No warrior can carry on a fight without support. Those who support the warriors are no less involved in the execution of the war than the warriors they support. Yet those who make the war possible are excused under the belief that they are not the enemy since they are not seen carrying weapons on the ‘front lines.’ No war can be won if the enemy can not be recognized.

In today’s world-wide war being waged against all non-Muslims by Islamic fighters and supported by the economies of Muslims around the world there is no hope for peace until leaders of non-Islamic nations can at least recognize who it is they should either surrender to or defeat.

Meanwhile America’s leaders continue the failed policy which refuses to recognize the value to the fighters of the ‘civilian’ population from which they come. No better example exist than this latest announcement that the U.S. military will actually punish its own service members for their involvement in what is labeled as the accidental bombing of a medical facility. A facility which may well have been treating enemy fighters or sympathetic civilians who support them. A facility critical to allowing the war against America to continue, perhaps even returning fighters to the front lines where they can kill other American combat servicemen and women or come to the U.S. and murder civilians in their effort to undermined support for America’s military effort to keep the fight overseas.

When Americans finally accept Obama’s and Hillary’s premise that it is our own fault these Muslims are killing civilians here and our servicemen and women around the world, will we repeat the protests of the Viet Nam era and again demand withdraw and surrender? But will the Muslim fighters return to their homeland or will they take possession of their spoils of war and become the conquerors who remain to rule their new land? Migration away from these predators is not possible, adapting to life as slaves or Muslims may be acceptable to some, but death as dictated by nature may well be the only alternative for many.

Is it wrong to label these Muslim fighters who bring this war into America’s cities as terrorists? Is what they are doing so much less than what should be expected by fighters in a war? Perhaps this war could be easier to understand if America’s leadership would accept that we have an enemy, recognize who that enemy is, and remember that the purpose in war is to kill people and destroy property until the enemy surrenders.

On Natural order for War

A natural law of nature governing survival is that a species must migrate, adapt, or die. Migration is the process of relocating to food, better shelter, or away from predators. Adaptation is the very slow process of physical change to better exist within the environment available; ie evolution. Dying is the result of not being able or willing to complete either of the other two.

The Unites States military has recently announced that 16 service people, including a general, will be punished for the “accidental” bombing of a medical facility in the area where an active conflict is raging and innocent people are regularly being murdered in horrific public beheadings and wholesale slaughter. These victims didn’t migrate, they couldn’t adapt to being Muslim, so they died.

Armies are said to always be prepared to win a new war having reviewed the strategies of the last one. But is that true if the previous war was neither won nor lost? No military conflict can be truly settled until one of the ideologies no longer has the support of its followers to continue sustaining losses of its people and property. Even ideologies must follow the rules of nature. When conditions warrant, those who believe in an ideology must adapt, migrate away from the adversity or die.

Support by the general populations of both Germany and Japan was withdrawn from their governments when losses were seen as greater than whatever gain might be won. Germany’s formidable army was well entrenched in Europe when the American led allies began sending thousands of bombers with thousands of tons of bombs deep behind the battle front lines and into the German homeland to ‘carpet bomb’ the infrastructure supporting the front-line armies. Killing people and destroying property is the entire purpose of war. It changes the habitat conditions of the enemy. Victory is won by whichever ideology does this best. Peace always results when followers of the losing ideology come to understand they must either stop fighting or suffer more than they are willing to do.

The horrific scene of the nuclear bombs in their homeland immediately changed the minds of Japanese from believing in the expansion of their empire to understanding that their very autonomy could be completely lost if the fighting continued. After the surrender of the forces led by both Germany and Japan, for the most part, American soldiers came home and the German and Japanese people were allowed to rebuild their countries and preserve much of their cultures. Today, both of these formidable enemies are valued friends of America.

But the same scenes of mass destruction that literally ended the great world war overnight also ended the resolve of Americans to win a war by fighting a war. Never again has America entered into a military conflict with any resolve whatsoever to defeat the opposition forces. Since those massive bombings that stopped the fighting around the world in the forties, the purpose of the American military overseas has been only to try to persuade the opposing ideologies to limit the fighting to specifically defined lines of combat and reach negotiated settlements without either side suffering losses to the civilian populations or their infrastructure. This is a policy which defies the very motivation for either side to stop fighting – no loss of support by the population for their government or ideological leaders. And so it is that for more than two decades now the warriors of Islam have been able to receive support and carry on their war against non-Muslims around the world.

Having been nearly unaffected by the recent world war, the Korean peninsula erupted into military conflict only a few years after the ‘bombs’ and the defacto hands off the land-behind-the-lines policy unilaterally initiated by the United States. That policy has resulted in no peaceful relationship between the two Koreas for more than 70 years. Some might argue the situation has even gotten more dangerous in recent years as North Korea’s government has never lost the support of the population to lift them from poverty by obtaining the obvious prosperity of its southern neighbor and even punishing the United States for helping South Korea keep them in poverty.

The Viet Nam Conflict might well have continued for a second decade except for the fact that the people of the United States clearly decided they were no longer willing to support the government’s action. But unlike Korea where neither side was willing to surrender, the Viet Nam peninsula is united and prosperous due undoubtedly to the fact that the U.S. accepted defeat, surrendered and withdrew.

No warrior can carry on a fight without support. Those who support the warriors are no less involved in the execution of the war than the warriors they support. Yet those who make the war possible are excused under the belief that they are not the enemy since they are not seen carrying weapons on the ‘front lines.’ No war can be won if the enemy can not be recognized.

In today’s world-wide war being waged against all non-Muslims by Islamic fighters and supported by the economies of Muslims around the world there is no hope for peace until leaders of non-Islamic nations can at least recognize who it is they should either surrender to or defeat.

Meanwhile America’s leaders continue the failed policy which refuses to recognize the value to the fighters of the ‘civilian’ population from which they come. No better example exist than this latest announcement that the U.S. military will actually punish its own service members for their involvement in what is labeled as the accidental bombing of a medical facility. A facility which may well have been treating enemy fighters or sympathetic civilians who support them. A facility critical to allowing the war against America to continue, perhaps even returning fighters to the front lines where they can kill other American combat servicemen and women or come to the U.S. and murder civilians in their effort to undermined support for America’s military effort to keep the fight overseas.

When Americans finally accept Obama’s and Hillary’s premise that it is our own fault these Muslims are killing civilians here and our servicemen and women around the world, will we repeat the protests of the Viet Nam era and again demand withdraw and surrender? But will the Muslim fighters return to their homeland or will they take possession of their spoils of war and become the conquerors who remain to rule their new land? Migration away from these predators is not possible, adapting to life as slaves or Muslims may be acceptable to some, but death as dictated by nature may well be the only alternative for many.

Is it wrong to label these Muslim fighters who bring this war into America’s cities as terrorists? Is what they are doing so much less than what should be expected by fighters in a war? Perhaps this war could be easier to understand if America’s leadership would accept that we have an enemy, recognize who that enemy is, and remember that the purpose in war is to kill people and destroy property until the enemy surrenders.

Degrading, De-funding, Demoralizing the Military

Comments by active and former military service members with Middle East tours are posted after numerous articles relating to the recent capture of two U.S.Navy Riverine Patrol boats by Iran. The insight these service men and women reveal about the deteriorating relationships between the U.S. and the countries in the middle east region is valuable as just one more tool to understand the extent of the steps Obama has taken and will take to complete his promised “transformation.” In addition to a relentless effort to degrade, de-budget and demoralize our military, soon the dollar itself will begin a rapid decline as the U.S. based petrodollar is replaced as the world’s trade currency.

The insulting and degrading reports that two of the navy’s finest small attack craft and their crews would simultaneously lose their way, lose their communications, lose their resourcefulness and simply surrender to the most outspoken enemy of the United States without any resistance is insulting to every current and former services member since Concord and before. Fortunately there were dozens of vessels in the area manned by more than enough honest men and women that the truth of that publicity stunt was exposed virtually overnight.

But throwing military “under the bus” to hide the truth has been standard operating procedure for this administration since 2008. Benghazi notwithstanding let us not forget an earlier event that dishonored the life and sacrifice of Commander Job W. Price, a SEAL assigned to the security detail of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on a not-too-secret trip to Ahwaz, Iran to meet with Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. When Cmdr Price was killed in the crash of the C-12 Huron that injured Clinton, his body was immediately flown to Afghanistan where a statement was issued by the military that he had committed suicide. But when concern that his fellow SEAL team members might ask how he got from Iran to Afghanistan and why, the official story changed to simply that his death was under investigation – no results these past 4 years. It appears that the memory of Cmdr Price’s outstanding and honorable service was dishonored to protect Obama’s nuclear trade negotiations with Iran.

The Iran nuclear agreement orchestrated by president Obama opened the bank doors to allow Iran to access hundreds of billions of dollars. And while the media and politicians focused on the fact that Iran will now be able to develop nuclear weapons, Iran immediately began converting those gifted assets away from dollars. Other nations of the region recognize the power of the economic weapon Obama handed over to our most vocal enemy – the power to destroy the U.S. Dollar and with it our economy and the little remaining faith in America to be trusted around the world.

NBC medical correspondent Robert Bazell probably said it best, “…there’s something else going on here that we’re not being told.”

Meanwhile the efforts by Russia and Iran to thrive in spite of Western sanctions was being helped by the growing demand for Iranian oil in China. Even though Obama has lifted sanctions against Iran and added some $170billion of U.S. taxpayer money to sweeten the deal, Russia, China and Iran have agreed to trade without the use of the U.S. dollar as the base currency. This trade exchange without the use of the dollar tied to oil will undermine the economy of Saudi Arabia and the petrodollar relationship that has tied the U.S. to Saudi Arabia and OPEC since America abandoned the gold standard for the dollar some fifty years ago.

It is no secrete among those who serve in the military in the region that the Saudi government is not happy with the Obama administration placing its priorities to appease Iran above the 50 years of cooperation with Saudi Arabia and the other friendly nations in the region. Many believe the refusal by the Saudis to allow the U.S. Navy to use Saudi territorial waters is one reason the Riverine Patrol boats were so close to Iran’s Farsi Island in the first place.

After degrading the military the non-dollar trading has the effect of disarming the West’s last biggest weapon; economic sanctions. The affect has already begun to spread beyond the sanctioned countries.

Website Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑